What I'm about to present might seem silly on the face of it because it's so simple and, frankly, idiotic in a way. And yet-- I arrive at this geometric inversion not from the point of view of an idiot-- but rather of an astute contributor and student of the fake moon landings, the fakery of 9/11, a forum creator and leader and podcast guest on Fakeologist.com. To easy your consience if you think you're reading the rant of an idiot, consider the idea that sometimes, in life, the simplest ideas are the truest. So take the case of a circle divided up like a pizza pie. Then flip the slices of pizza back over themselves so that the same edge butts up on the same edge. Witness the diagram-- an indispensible tool for thought-- a tool not taught explicitly in schools. Gee I wonder why not eh? Maybe it's because diagrams help us think through to the truth. Observe.
The question marks indicate "missing land areas" on the "Plain of Antarctica" of the Flat Earth. These spaces are created by virtue of flipping the pieces of pizza pie backwards over themselves-- and they are spaces that are not and CAN not be mapped on the ISLAND of Antarctica. So what of them? Do we have evidence of vast expanses like that-- not mapped-- yet in existence?
FLAT EARTH ADVOCATES
I've been perusing a lot of flat earth forums, videos and websites. None of them covers the approach I've just presented. Why not? Is it because flat earth is a hoax? Maybe. I'm not convinced of flat earth. I'm neither convinced of global earth. My approach is this: IF... "IF"... flat earth exists... THEN, the above. Right? And if the above, THEN the advocates for flat earth would do well to address this fundamental geometry.
ANTARCTIC ISLAND as a PIZZA PIE
FLIPPNG THE PIECES Of PIZZA OVER we get this.
To create the illusion of living on a globe, "they" did the opposite of what I just did. They divided the sections of the Antarctic perimeter up and flipped them FORWARD over them selves to create an "island" called Antarctica, consistent with a globe and a CLOSED SYSTEM-- forever hiding the OPEN SYSTEM of EARTH PONDS we're actually living on.
I am also studying this issue (for years) and am unconvinced 100% either way. 1._If the Earth is flat, shouldn't the planets that "are" spheres reside under the globe too? We can see planets as we see the stars. 2._If they aren't trying to cover up a lie, why is the UN blocking private citizens from exploring antarctica themselves? 3._If the Earth is a sphere, why does the "curvature" distance not increase when traveling point A to B to C and what is the equation to use when trying to account for the curvature?
ReplyDeleteThey say planets are spheres but how do we know that for sure? I'm not sure. I just see points of light in the night sky. Antarctica is certainly off limits. I think the curvature creates a drop of something like a foot per mile-- that's not accurate-- but a rough guess. There is a formula for this based on earth's supposed radius. Many youtubers have proven this isn't the case. There's a famous experiment done in England where a boat on a straight river doesn't go beneath the horizon in several miles as it should. There are 200 proofs for flat earth offered by famous flat earther -- Eric Dubay http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html
ReplyDelete