Hi, I'm Captain Rick of the Virtual Circumference Voyage of Antarctica. I intend to prove definitively if Earth is flat or a sphere by paying careful attention to how many miles we cover as we travel "around" Antarctica. Flat earth theory says it's 50-60,000 miles. Spherical Earth theory says it 14,000 miles. Join me and ask any questions that you think would help our mission.
I accidentally deleted fran's comment about my stats-- but thanks, Fran. I see you posted my updated map on your facebook page, thanks for that. If we spread it, it'll attract more interest.
ReplyDeleteOh man, this is really stressful. I just a lot of passionate good stuff on here and when I hit preview it just disappeared. Damn it... Don't have the energy to even put back into rewriting what I wrote lest the same happens again... In essence, thank you Rick for using your sovereign mind and letting me know that there are individuals such as yourself critically thinking and researching out there, and it is a real relief to come across your page after seeing countless numbers of controlled opposition on top of controlled opposition on YouTube made to look like individuals twice and thrice removed, when indeed there is much less conversation, legitimate individual research happening than made to appear. I have never commented on YouTube or any other online forum until the other night after coming across a newer video from "my perspective" about a baby born in flight crossing from Bali to LAX, and I did the math which was lacking in said video and then shared it in the comments section on those news videos for the story. There is much more information to share, but for starters I would like to share this as another piece to build upon what you have done already on your blog here:
ReplyDelete-----------------------------------------------------------
I would like to share with you a very recent story that you’re likely to have heard about already, about a woman who gave birth on plane six hours into transit from Bali (Ngurah Rai International Airport) to LAX. The pilot ended up making an emergency landing in Anchorage (Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport): https://www.google.com/search?q=taiwan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=baby+born+on+plane+taiwan.
There is one thing very puzzling, or should be puzzling to people, about this story: why did the pilot drive an extra 749.884 miles than he had to and take the woman and her baby to Anchorage rather than Honolulu upon the realization that an emergency landing was needed? I did the following calculations on the Map Distance Calculator at the link following this sentence, and you’re welcome to replicate my calculations yourself:
http://www.daftlogic.com/projects-google-maps-distance-calculator.htm
Honolulu Emergency Landing and then to Final LAX Destination
Bali Airport TO Spot at which pilot recognized the need for an emergency landing - 3332.983 miles
Emergency Landing Acknowledgement TO Honolulu International Airport - 3102.615 miles
Emergency Landing Acknowledgement TO Honolulu International Airport to LAX - 5657.546 miles
Bali TO Emergency Realization Spot TO Honolulu TO LAX - 8990.529 miles
Anchorage Emergency Landing and then to Final LAX Destination
Bali Airport TO Spot at which pilot recognized the need for an emergency landing - 3332.983 miles
Emergency Landing Acknowledgement TO Anchorage Airport - 3852.499 miles
Emergency Landing Acknowledgement TO Anchorage Airport to LAX - 6197.840 miles
Bali TO Emergency Realization Spot TO Anchorage TO LAX - 9530.823 miles
9530.823 miles - 8990.529 miles = 540.294 extra miles flown out of the way as a result of choosing Anchorage over Honolulu! Why?! Does the pilot have a preference for the hospital in Anchorage versus that of Honolulu? Why would the pilot fly an extra 540.294 miles out of the way in total after all is said and done, let alone fly an extra 749.884 miles (3852.499 miles – 3102.615 miles) out of the way from the nearest major hospital upon the realization that an emergency landed was needed? This makes no sense!
I just looked at these flight paths on the "globe" flight routes and yes, it certainly is absurd to land up in Anchorage instead of stopping at Honolulu, as it's "on the way" to LAX. But of course, on a flat earth map, it makes perfect sense! Anchorage comes along quite well before LAX! One day this will really gain attention. Surely pilots must be suspicious of these anomolies when they arise!!!! Are they also part of the charade, part of the "actors" team working for NASA???? Thank you for this. My son just flew back to Australia from New York, and he couldn't understand why they had to fly from New York all the way "past" Australia, to a connecting flight in Dubai to fly back to his city of Darwin in Australia. Of course on a flat earth it is blatantely obvious, but on the "globe" map its nonsensical to say the least! He also commented on how busy Dubai airport is. If only he knew why!!!!! I am yet to bring this subject up with him, but I am certainly intending to! I am going to start a facebook page on this topic as we really do need to get this out to the public!! Thank you for your post. Cheers, Lee :-)
DeleteHey Lee, good to hear from you. I have JPEG screenshots for visuals I could send over, but I am unable to post the pics via this blog comment section. The first time I came across the planes as another means of showing the plane was after seeing a video called "The Earth is Flat ~ The Planes Prove the Plane" by "rolling thunder42" on YouTube about six months ago. Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNVgzk3tbl0.
DeleteI'm glad to hear that you and your son can put two and two together about Dubai and the absurdity of an Australian flight (to Darwin) passing through there, and while I can see that the telling detail of the pregnancy story is the fact that the pilot drove 750 miles an hour to an hour and a half) out of the way (not so on the plane), people in comments sections on YouTube miss it blatantly and our discussing the citizenship (rather making nativist remarks and jokes) of the woman of her baby. The question is: how do you get the average person to see the importance of these occurrences?
It would make a great post and contribution for yourself or Captain Rick to conglomerate flight path's, such as the trip your son just took, on the plane vs. on the globe.
Typos. I swear this Blogger thing puts typos in there haha:
Delete*drove 750 miles (an hour to an hour and a half)*
*of the woman and her baby*
*contribution from yourself or Captain Rick*
P.S. Just looked at the fakeologist.com site that you had a link to up top, and while there certainly may be some critical thinkers making there way there perchance and having good discussion (read a few threads), the curator/administrator of the site is either mislead by his own lack empiricism or a psyop itself giving a handful of truth and then sprinkling that truth with some bullshit. Posting on such a site can make an independent researcher such as yourself lose credibility by posting on there to somebody that may lump everything into conspiracy: the 9/11 section alone is disturbingly stupid. For the shill to say nobody died on 9/11 is moronic, as many people I know have either lost someone in their family, whether they be firemen or workers that day. If that site was made by a truly wise individual the conclusion he would have reached, if any, would be through the scientific method and approaching the event through empirical evidence. The conclusion drawn by Dr. Judy Wood after a painstaking 500-something page book, "Where Did the Towers Go?" indicates direct-energy weaponry (DEW). So, follow up and read that book (takes a week or two) if you would like to understand what took place that day and in order to contextualize with your awareness of the true nature of our Earth. I bring on this other topic, which is not so much a topic - topics are meant to keep things separate - because the site you seemed excited about posting on linked above - fakeologist.com - appears to be either a shill or a delusional person with their own conclusions set out before them and is either way not conducting research rationally and applying the scientific method as you are on this blog.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the posts, MIke and Lee-- I'll be reviewing them again later this week. My current attack on the problem is to line up the surveyor's azimuthal Antarctic coast with the 1895 Gleason map and with my own installment of the locations of the current research stations. Then I'll review the "inspection tours" again under Antarctic Treaty and try to find out when the next inspection tour is. I've yet to make email contact with anyone at the stations but it's an option. I have to gather data on distance and time by boat or plane between locations posted by workers at the stations that they often post on their blogs. By cross-referencing all that, my theory is that we should have enough to prove a 60K or 15K coast perimeter.
DeleteThanks, Rick. I appreciate the work that you're doing and you're step by step process with the map-making, incredibly detailed and precise. Much appreciated and it allows for a good visual. Your way is clever and practical with what we can do with a computer. Nevertheless, even without doing this work of yours the easiest way of proving the plane and disproving the ball is with a telescope and demonstrating that there is no curvature.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, you did not address my comment in regards to your posting on that fakeologist site, which is damages your credibility either intentionally or unintentionally. While an individual may be okay on there, the curator of that site is either nuts or a shill as a result of this notion that everything is actors. What a strange benevolence is assumed in that paranoia about actors and nobody dying. Sure, people died, many people died on 9/11, and there's no qualms about killing people when it suits a psychopath's needs, such as for those that coordinated the events of that day. The key to 9/11 is Direct Energy Weaponry (DEW) and the implications of free energy. This is science (see Dr. Judy Wood's "Where Did the Towers Go?"). Lumping truth with nonsense damages the Truth near it and will allow people new to the ideas all the more reason to disregard as a result of the association created.
For now, on this comment, I don't have any calculations to add and share with you, but I'll add something a tad entertaining for you, for maybe you have kids that are still watching Pixar films. I was surfing and I came across a video with all of the "Pizza Planet" truck sightings in every Pixar film; it's an Easter egg that they have in each one. Here's the link (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXbV5UesmHs). The subliminal joke is that we're on a pizza planet, in that duh it's flat, and that the azimuthal projection in the UN logo is in eight pizza slices as are the pieces of Antarctica when you cut them out and reverse them as you did here (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-X-rKdU1MSZA/VVqBZW73QHI/AAAAAAAAEJs/suNtydLXAt4/s1600/antarctica%2B-%2Binverted%2Bisland.jpg) to get the proper ice boundaries of the Earth pond. And, there is a rocket on top of the truck for NASA. Anyway, here's the sense of humor of the rulers for yah.
Thanks for your work, as always, and I'll check back again sometime soon.
Nobody died on 911. You come across as the shill. Go to the September Clues website and get a grip.
DeleteNobody died on 911. You come across as the shill. Go to the September Clues website and get a grip.
DeletePizza Planet-- what a great way to think about it! Who doesn't like pizza? I'll study that and likely do a few colorful posts on it. Thanks for the pointer.
ReplyDeleteRe 9/11-- I was into Judy Wood for a long time. The 100% fakery theory is my current view as a result of reading Simon Shack on SeptemberClues.com. I only ended up at Fakeologist after SeptemberClues convinced me of the 100% fakery and that day's electronic blackout over the area. I'm actually much further along into that line of thought than you even cited which includes the idea that the Trade Towers were nothing but mostly empty false fronts like those Saloons in old Western movies!!! They not only didn't have people in them... they didn't have half the number of "floors" we thought. They had to have been totally empty cubes! I KNOW it sounds crazy. I'm simply trying to accomodate the "small pile of debris" seen after the "collapse" relative to what "should" have been there.
Judy Wood is a real blast from the past for me. I was totally into that. Thanks for hanging out here and commenting. I appreciate the input. The telescope method to prove no curvature is excellent too--- I've been watching videos on that and I do like them. I don't discuss them here because I want to zero in and specialize in my approach. Maybe I'll meet the telescope guys at some point-- and we can use several angles to get this locked down. I also like the southern hemisphere no-direct-flight evidence. And the gyroscopes. I love gyroscopes. It astonished me we can't come up with a nail-down on this-- a Q.E.D. as they made me do for proofs in high school and university math.
Hey Rick, you're welcome, and I'll continue to engage you in order that whoever comes to this page leaves more enlightened, both through the positive contributions that you are posting, ones that I am posting, and through my critical dissection of you and your work and/or associations that you're bringing to the table.
ReplyDeleteA few things for consideration for you:
1) Dr. Judy Wood's book studies the empirical evidence of 9/11, using the scientific method and concludes the use of Direct Energy Weaponry (DEW) and its implications for the availability of Free Energy. While you have cited "theory", she, and I by extension, cite "empirical evidence," "reality," and the "scientific method". A great foreword to her book, as you may remember is that "Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic."
2) My Uncle, an electrician, worked on the towers all throughout construction. My cousin-in-law's brother died while working, as did many fathers and others from Long Island, where I live. People certainly worked in the towers daily and they were certainly occupied.
3) Everything was molecularly dissociated (including those inside), as you know, if you read the 550 page book, and turned into super fine nanoparticles that were light enough to carry away into the air. These fine nanoparticles, the molecularly dissociated towers, is what gave so many of the volunteer workers their horrible illnesses in their lungs.
Have a great day and ttys.