like we have the long range radar ay Syowa and Halley stations, the chinese most land inward station (with airstrip) Kunlun, located at Dome A, at 4037m!, will be equipped with telescopes. see. http://mcba11.phys.unsw.edu.au/~plato/papers/yua12a.pdf http://www.astronomy.scar.org/AAA2013/pdf/Shang.pdf (!) http://www.china.org.cn/china/news/2009-07/24/content_18194380.htm It can filter atmospheric distortion, and is to be pointed to the sky, BUT can be pointed to spot something over land as well.
And since earth may be flat, if they point that think "outward" over the flatland, they may be able to see the dome or the next earth pond... or the next sun over the outer earth ponds.... or who knows what? Thanks for those.
Thanks for the tip. I looked at one of his many videos for a minute and decided against him. He pointed out how an antarctica station 'looked fake" and how the horizon was flat. I've seen these arguments before and they're not good enough for me. Jungle Surfer isn't doing a very good job either when he says the stations are fake. Fake stations are not consistent with my approach. Chipmunk needs to have a page where he simply writes his top 10 wrong things about Antarctica because I'm not going to have time to slog through all his tedious material. But thanks anyway.
hi, May I have to ask something to you Rick? what percentage of certainty could be argued that it is possible to go further outside the Antarctic? I mean beyond continuing to patrol the earth by flight in high altitude by advanced technological means, including making a topographic map in part, create a telecomunication link between the object and send later in Antarctic reception point. 0% 10% 40% 60% or 100% sure they already do right now?
amazing blog,. can i add your blog in one of my next video on youtube channel? this is my channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvOYxyL2AuPQYNG2xsrrg3A
Hi, I'm Captain Rick of the Virtual Circumference Voyage of Antarctica. I intend to prove definitively if Earth is flat or a sphere by paying careful attention to how many miles we cover as we travel "around" Antarctica. Flat earth theory says it's 50-60,000 miles. Spherical Earth theory says it 14,000 miles. Join me and ask any questions that you think would help our mission.
like we have the long range radar ay Syowa and Halley stations, the chinese most land inward station (with airstrip) Kunlun, located at Dome A, at 4037m!, will be equipped with telescopes. see.
ReplyDeletehttp://mcba11.phys.unsw.edu.au/~plato/papers/yua12a.pdf
http://www.astronomy.scar.org/AAA2013/pdf/Shang.pdf (!)
http://www.china.org.cn/china/news/2009-07/24/content_18194380.htm
It can filter atmospheric distortion, and is to be pointed to the sky, BUT can be pointed to spot something over land as well.
And since earth may be flat, if they point that think "outward" over the flatland, they may be able to see the dome or the next earth pond... or the next sun over the outer earth ponds.... or who knows what? Thanks for those.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou need to join forces with "Chippy The Chipmunk" on youtube. He is making some great Antarctica FE vids
ReplyDeleteThanks for the tip. I looked at one of his many videos for a minute and decided against him. He pointed out how an antarctica station 'looked fake" and how the horizon was flat. I've seen these arguments before and they're not good enough for me. Jungle Surfer isn't doing a very good job either when he says the stations are fake. Fake stations are not consistent with my approach. Chipmunk needs to have a page where he simply writes his top 10 wrong things about Antarctica because I'm not going to have time to slog through all his tedious material. But thanks anyway.
DeleteHi Rick, This info might help you in your calculations
ReplyDeletehttp://www.csbf.nasa.gov/newzealand/wanaka.htm
Rick
ReplyDeleteFedor Konyukhov Is back. Now in the air.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-12/russian-fedor-konyukhov-in-hot-air-balloon-world-record-bid/7588458
Hi Rick, see if this helps you https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XyiqrciamMM
ReplyDeletehi, May I have to ask something to you Rick?
ReplyDeletewhat percentage of certainty could be argued that it is possible to go further outside the Antarctic? I mean beyond continuing to patrol the earth by flight in high altitude by advanced technological means, including making a topographic map in part, create a telecomunication link between the object and send later in Antarctic reception point. 0% 10% 40% 60% or 100% sure they already do right now?
amazing blog,. can i add your blog in one of my next video on youtube channel?
ReplyDeletethis is my channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvOYxyL2AuPQYNG2xsrrg3A
u think the earth is flat? i think the earth is fat...huge, in fact
ReplyDelete