Sunday, February 12, 2017

Is Halley VI fake? Is it being "decommissioned"?


Until I can verify this Halley VI as real in more ways than a Youtube video and the say-so of "authorities", I'm going to reserve judgement on its existence. Jungle Surfer has pointed out some inconsistencies in the presentation of other stations on his youtube channel. Although I have not concluded anything, I think I have to now be careful, in 2017, that the circumference of Antarctica I plan to measure by doing a virtual tour of what-I-originally-thought-were-real-research-stations, is tempered by some double checking of the very existence of these stations. This one in particular, Halley VI, seems a bit unbelievable what-with-it's hydraulic lift legs and overall worm-crawl across the ice. It seems more like "science-fiction" than reality. Take a look. (Indexed below under Halley VI)


BIG (fake?) NEWS FOR HALLEY
It turns out that this month, everyone is being evacuated because of a big crack in the ice that Halley's worm-station can't out-crawl. So their entire premise of crawling along to save their station is bogus apparently. You "CAN" certainly "make-this-stuff-up". I read science fiction for years. And this is this STUFF of sci fi.

halley vi - Google Search


Incredible facts about the Halley VI research station

BBC News‎ - Jan 17, 2017
A huge crack in the ice near an important scientific research station is forcing it to move to a new location. The Halley VI is a British Antarctic ...
British scientists forced to close Halley Antarctica research station for ... Daily Mail
Britain's Halley VI Research Station Closed by Antarctic Ice CrackNBCNews.com
A Giant Ice Crack Is Forcing the Evacuation of the Halley Antarctic ...ScienceAlert
Sky News - International Business Times UK


Break in Ice Forces the Cancellation of Winter Research at Antarctic ...

snopes.com‎ - 2 days ago
The British Antarctic Survey decided against wintering scientists in their Halley VI Station after a large, unpredictable crack developed nearby.
Massive ice shelf break forces Antarctic researchers to evacuate PBS NewsHour
Polar architecture: the research bases built using green ideas Financial Times
Watch: Amazing effort to move Cambridge Antarctic base on skis Cambridge News
ZME Science - Catholic Online











Published on Jan 16, 2017
UAV (unmanned airborne vehicle) flight along a crack in the Brunt Ice Shelf, which appeared. This was detected by scientists in October 2016.

Halley VI station (https://www.bas.ac.uk/polar-operation...) is in the final stages of being relocated 23 km from its present site to put it upstream of a previously dormant ice chasm that began to show signs of growth in 2012.

In October 2016, a second crack appeared some 17 km to the north of the research station. Since then glaciologists have monitored the growth of this crack using a network of GPS instruments that measure the deformation of the ice, together with European Space Agency satellite imagery, ground penetrating radar, and on-site drone footage, which show that the recent changes to the Brunt Ice Shelf have not been seen before.

This second crack is shown in this video. Learn more on our website: https://www.bas.ac.uk/media-post/hall...






BAS will shut down Antarctica's Halley VI in winter because of ice ...

MercoPress‎ - Jan 19, 2017
British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has decided not to winter at Halley VI Research Station for safety reasons. The station, which is located on the ...
Massive Antarctic ice crack shutters British research station Mother Nature Network (blog)
Antarctic ice shelf rift forces UK scientists to leave Hindustan Times
Climate Change Shut Down a Research Station in Antarctica, and ...Motherboard
CDA News - DemocratLive
halley vi - Google Search








Halley was safe from first crack after moving but now SECOND CRACK! 


The 'caterpillar' is safe! Antarctic research station is dragged 14 miles across an ice shelf to avo - YouTube

The problem is further compounded by a second crack, which has opened up to the north of the base, on a route sometimes used to deliver supplies.
The team has just nine weeks to move the research station, before the harsh winter sets in.
The base will be broken up into its eight modules and moved further inland by large tractors.
Scientific research w



UK completes Antarctic Halley base relocation - YouTube







Published on Feb 2, 2017
UK completes Antarctic Halley base relocation
The British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has completed the move of its Halley research station.
The base is sited on the floating - and moving - Brunt Ice Shelf, and had to be relocated or face being dumped in the ocean.
Tractors were used to tow the eight modules that make up the futuristic-looking Halley 23km further "inland".


BAS is now in the process of reorganising all this research to take account of the forthcoming shutdown.
Although automatic weather stations can continue to collect their data on solar and battery energy, pretty much all other experiments will have to be suspended.

Of the 16 people who would ordinarily expect to over-winter at Halley, three will now work out of the UK's Rothera station on the Antarctic Peninsula instead.

Another individual will go to King Edward Point station on South Georgia.
All the others will come back to BAS HQ in Cambridge.
Halley will be re-opened in November - the start of the next summer season.


PUT ON HEADPHONES... and listen-- great vibrato guitar-- and bass. Halley VI Research Station relocation success - YouTube

Having moved the station, further concerns about a further crack which had been discovered on 31 October 2016 led the BAS to announce that they would withdraw their staff from the base in March 2017, for the duration of the Antarctic winter.[39] In February 2017, The base completed their relocation which is now 23km further "inland" from the crack.[40]
Halley Research Station - Wikipedia



HALEY VI
move in 2014Garage & Drewery Building Move - Halley VI, Antarctica - YouTube

They have time to make silly films in Antarctica
The Princess and the Pea - Antarctic 48-hour film competition, KEP South Georgia - YouTube

Time lapse
Halley Research Station Antarctica Winter 2015 - YouTube

Case study
Halley VI – Hydraulic Leg Jacking System
British Antarctic Survey


>>>Rick says... So if the hydraulic legs keep the modules above the snow, what keeps those Caterpillar snowplows above the snow? 


>>>Rick says....Are we sure this isn't a model? How can we verify the existence of this "station"? Where is it serviced from? Where are there photos of the landing crew? 


>>>Rick says... in the video (linked one line above), we're treated to a review of the construction process of Halley VI. Delivery of parts were by plane (really?--- where is the runway on this ice?)... and ship (seen below)... docked at the ice shelf. The ship is the ERNEST SHAKELTON... These Antarctica ice breakers seem associated with particular stations. ernest shakleton icebreaker antarctica - Google Search

>>>If the crew at Halley VI is being evacuated, why is the Shakelton icebreaker moored in the Falklands as of Jan. 16 2017?



>>>Rick says... Observe the "parts" below. Those parts will be assembled into modules, apparently, that include all kinds of machinery.





>>>Here is an example of the steel girdered framework of just ONE module.



>>>...which turns into a fully constructed interior like this....



>>>Incredibly, a full scale building engineering set up results from the frame and panels. 


>>>Of course, it took "teamwork". 
 

Of course, the builder has much experience building things... Galliford Fry
The Group employs around 5,500 employees and benefits from a strong client base and integrated supply chain, spanning both industries in which it operates.

>>>QUESTION: If this station is relocatable AND if a second crack was found... why not relocate again? 

Here's another short film about Halley VI

Rick says... the narrator in that video says snowstorms can bury buildings within hours. How, then, do the modules (and snowplows) stay ahead of that? In the photo below, is it snow/ice sticking uniformly to the sides of the modules? 


Here we apparnetly see equipment loaded onto the platform before it's enclosed. I'm not sure how those hydraulic legs work. Shouldn't there be a pump or compressor directly above each one for them to be extended like that? Are we looking at a model? How fast are these things supposed to be able to move? Why is it being abandoned due a "second crack" in the ice? 


What exactly is the tower in the foreground? Wires coming out suggest it leads to a power source. Is it gas powered? Where are the fuel tanks. Everywhere in Antarctica are piles of oil drums called "fuel depots". Where is the "environmentally sound" fuel depot for this operation? 







RELOCATION of HALLEY VI-- and some puzzling anomalies associated with it. (updated by Rick on Tues., Feb. 21, 2017)

Felix, a frequent commenter here, pointed me to a website of one Hugh Broughton (Brought On-- Bring It On?)...  apparently the architect firm of a dozen partners who designed Halley VI-- and so therefore presumably designed the built in assumptions of possibilities of moves along with the design of the hangars for the tractors and cranes (meant as sarcasm since I don't see any pictures of buildings to house tractors and cranes like I do, for instance, at the bigger USA station, McMurdo). Hugh "Bring it On" BroughtOn-- brought on board?--  has a fairly thin (cheesy?) website here... Cold Feet | News | Hugh Broughton Architects . I note that their News page features a whopping 8 entries on one page since March 2016. The company was founded, they say, in 1995. So for 20 years they apparently did not have any news to report. Their Journal  About | Hugh Broughton Architects , goes back to 2014. So for 19 years they had no journal. ANOMALIES like this are what lead FAKEOLOGISTS like me (hoaxologists) to at least suspect that we may be viewing an internet hoax.

MAP OF THE MOVE AND LOCATION
The construction engineers, GallifordTry    Flagship Projects – Galliford Try Plc   ...makes no mention of the architect firm Hugh Brought-on-board BroughtOn. Vice versa: Broughton makes no mention of GallifordTry (Gallant Try?). Their news pages go back to 2009 and their About Us description doesn't bother to say how long they've been around. Back to Hugh Brought-On-Board: Note the only map I've seen is provided by him which is quite fascinating because it begs questions about the timeline of the cracks that forced the move and the lastest evacuation (which I speculate might be a decommissioning-- of what was a hoax in the first place.
CHASM 1 CRACK
Note first the progression of the CHASM 1 CRACK which proceed year by year toward Halley VI. This was the reason for the move to the NEW SITE on the big map above. As I understand it so far, they they moved the for the FIRST TIME since they completed the building in 2012, in Jan 2017. They moved it toward another crack-- we'll call it the Oct 31st 2016 Crack. Keep in mind that there is a CHASM 2 which has NO CRACK... beside CHASM 1. Got that? Let's review.
a) Find Chasm 1 above.
b) Find Chasm 2 above, beside Chasm 1.
c) Find the 31st Oct 2016 22km crack NOT associated with a CHASM, but rather part of the MacDonald Rumples (Ronald McDonald, Rumplestiltskin?)

How does the NEWS about Halley VI show up on Google, related to the "Chasm 1 Crack" and the 22km MacDonald Ice Rumples crack"?


Incredible facts about the Halley VI research station

BBC News‎ - Jan 17, 2017
A huge crack in the ice near an important scientific research station is forcing it to move to a new location. The Halley VI is a British Antarctic ...
British scientists forced to close Halley Antarctica research station for ... Daily Mail
Britain's Halley VI Research Station Closed by Antarctic Ice CrackNBCNews.com
A Giant Ice Crack Is Forcing the Evacuation of the Halley Antarctic ...ScienceAlert
Sky News - International Business Times UK

Rick says... Note the BBC date, Jan. 17, 2017 for the first item "a huge crack". Presumably that's Chasm I Crack. This is the reason the station was moved-- ironically closer to the 22Km MacDonald Ice Rumple crack for which they are now abandoning ship? The Daily Mail, in the second link above, wrote "Now, researchers say a second crack and has been spotted, and is so unpredictable that researchers will return home once the relocation is complete.  

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMuxFC1S
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"

Rick continues... "A second crack HAS BEEN SPOTTED".... yet the label on the "second crack"-- presumably the 22 km MacDonald Ice Rumple Crack was noted in Oct. 2016. MY QUESTION: If the 22 km crack was spotted in Oct. 2016, why not pick yet a better location? And how does that 22 km crack allow them to re-occupy Halley VI in Nov. 2017 as they claim they will? quote

quote
The first chasm, which had lain dormant for more than three decades, began opening up in 2012, and by the following year it was expanding at the rapid pace of one mile per year.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMvtBXVG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
unquote

Rick smirks with a look of unbelief-- saying-- What? The first chasm was dormant for 30 years (how did we know that)-- then JUST AS HALLEY VI WAS COMPLETED (in 2012) the crack began to extend toward Halley VI? (Is this a "story element" that was added to ensure that the possibly Fake Halley VI idea could be retired in several years? This SOUNDS scripted from the get-go in my opinion). Did anyone get recorded saying an expletive when they found this out? Did anyone get fired? Who chose the first location JUST AS THAT CRACK BEGAN to expand? 

quote
If the research station is not relocated, it could be swallowed by the ice by 2020.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMwv2piU 
 unquote

Rick wonders... Don't their models show the possibility of the calving of the ice shelf resulting in a huge chunk floating off the coast with the station intact? They'd simply be a floating station, then, wouldn't they? Why are they being so pessimistic about the station being SWALLOWED by the ice?

Halley has also taken ozone measurements continually since 1956, with the team first discovering the Antarctic Ozone Hole in 1985.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMxTWadg
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The hole! The hole! It's the OZONE hole! THIS Halley station (a previous iteration) is THE station that "discovered" the OZONE hole. (Made it up?). The hole in the O-Zone layer-- is what got Air Conditioners in cars and homes to switch from FREON to a new form of coolant. I forget the new name but apparently air conditioners were responsible for creating the hole in the sky. (The sky is falling! The sky is falling!--- variation---> The sky has a hole in it! There's a hole in my bucket, Dear Liza Dear Liza.). 

Tim Stockings, Director of Operations at the British Antarctic Survey, told the Telegraph: 'Halley Research Station was designed and engineered specifically to be re-located in response to changes in the ice.
'Over the last couple of years, our operational teams have been meticulous in developing very detailed plans for the move.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMyJLbvc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tim STOCKINGS stockings - Google Search created "detailed plans" for "the move" which ended up moving the station CLOSER to the 22 km ice rumple crack that they are now evacuating that station for. So why not simply move again? Maybe Halley VI wasn't designed to move THAT much. Maybe the guys are tired out from moving the modules and want to go home. Maybe Tim STOCKINGS said "Ahh shit, let's just fuck it and go the fuck home. SHIT!". What kind of name is a piece of women's clothing anyway? Does he work with Bob Panties? or Gerald Brazeer?

The research base also hosts an ongoing European Space Agency (ESA) experiment, testing how well people can adapt to life in remote and isolated locations.
The data will be used in preparations for long space flights, such as the first Mars landing.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4125458/British-scientists-close-Antarctica-research-station.html#ixzz4ZMzQMwb1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

SO-- THIS is what MARS is going to be like? Well, fuck that then, right? Screw it. At the first sign of a "little crack", let's all go home. You know, it occurs to me, that the early settlers didn't have that option. I guess when your name is part of women's underwear, and you're dealing with "cracks" all over the place, you just give up real easy. If the ESA really wanted to TEST their crew for a MARS operation, why not STAY and DEAL WITH IT? 

CONCLUSION: I'm just having fun with this, this morning. It sure sucks when you spend all that time "moving" however, and then find another crack so you have to leave "to be safe". With winter coming on, it will be interesting to see if the whole thing gets buried (in their narrative) or falls into an accelerating Crack 1 Crevice.... 












15 comments:

  1. Good investigation, Rick. I hope it's still there in November! No mention of the "flagship" Halley VI station at the Galliford Try wiki page -
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galliford_Try

    All very very strange.
    It doesn't quite fit in with those other flagship projects, does it?
    I wonder who else was competing for the contract.

    This guy was apparently a project manager for building Halley VI for Galliford....
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-keating-bbb31a8

    Overall project manager from the military
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-tuplin-97aa3a63

    Total value of the Project £60,000,000
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/wernermocke

    A few more here if you search
    linkedin "galliford try" antactica "project manager"

    I wonder who won this 2014 tower raising contract?
    https://data.gov.uk/data/contracts-finder-archive/download/1393206/39d481cd-afa6-4135-974c-ab691a5b24df.

    http://www.publictenders.net/node/2208872

    There's a rare picture of a single Komatsu tracked vehicle working there in 2005 showing how it's done...
    https://www.operc.com/newsarticle.asp?id=284

    It seems a South AFrican consortium allegedly helped the build
    http://www.eprop.co.za/commercial-property-news/item/8525-Extreme-building.html

    Suddenly, Antarctic living is mainstream - Financial Times February 2017
    https://www.ft.com/content/4e6005ae-e93f-11e6-967b-c88452263daf

    and there's another big Halley VI move puff here
    https://www.highways.today/2017/02/04/antarctic-research-station-halley-vi-creates-highway-snow/

    Who knows what's really going on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the extra insights. I searched GallifordFry's annual reports and found these references to Halley VI
    http://www.gallifordtry.co.uk/site-services/search-results?ResultPage=1&Domain=all&query=halley%20VI&searchphrase=exact

    The way the references to Halley VI disappear in the later annual reports reminds me of the way in which the entire nuclear power hoax is being decommissioned-- what with few plants being built-- since they never existed as power generators in the first place.

    NASA's satellites are still being promoted however. I don't know how they're going to decommission that myth.

    There have never been any videos showing how Halley VI hydraulic legs are raised. When you think about it, it doesn't even make sense because where is the "extra leg length" stored? How high did they expect to have to raise the module? Why is the module starting out so high to begin with? Why aren't the tractors and snowploughs around it buried by now? The entire scheme seems more like a comic book than actual engineering. And where did a condo and office building developer like GallifordFry acquire the expertise to design such a comic book apparatus? From a comic book perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One more thing-- I was fooled by the Apollo lander for years. If they can fake sending a man to the moon, they can fake an Antarctica station. (play on "if they can send a man to the moon...").

      Delete
    2. I was looking also for video evidence of the legs of Halley VI being raised. There's a still here at 0.13
      http://us.tomonews.com/uk-s-halley-research-station-skis-14-miles-inland-in-antarctica-for-safety-3271027
      showing a few people hanging around.

      From the Atkins spec for the leg raising lark...
      http://www.atkinsglobal.co.uk/~/media/Files/A/Atkins-Corporate/group/sectors-documents/nuclear/library-docs/case-studies/Halley%20VI_ATKINS.pdf

      "In the summer season each of the legs can be raised one at a time and then snow packed under to raise the base level of the module up to the level of the surrounding snow"

      "In 2007 M G Bennett and Associates were responsible for designing the hydraulic leg jacking system for each module."

      It looks like each unit has four legs - so they shorten one leg [the equivalent of sawing off a length of a chair leg] by retracting it inside the module and then shovel show under it before it comes down again. So one would expect it to tip over, as with sitting on a chair with three legs, surely? They they repeat the process for all the other legs of all the modules...

      Smells like BS to me. That would send all those snooker balls flying [seen at 2.48 here]
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PImAeaO8cHI
      Yet more still images, not a single piece of action footage showing movement.

      Galliford do seem very active in the South Atlantic...
      http://www.gallifordtry.co.uk/~/media/Files/G/GallifordTry/documents/1-2-17_Interational_Brochure.pdf

      Delete
  3. thanks for those links-- I viewed all of them. Atkins interested me most. you wrote
    "In the summer season each of the legs can be raised one at a time and then snow packed under to raise the base level of the module up to the level of the surrounding snow"
    Yet more still images, not a single piece of action footage showing movement.

    Just to get a feel for what a video of this would look like, I viewed a few car hydraulic lift videos.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biBlqOzujSw

    Its kind of exciting to witness-- many times in person I stand watching my car being hydraulically lifted-- fascinating demo of physics. Mechanics do it every day so its lost on them. You'd think that this being a defining trait of Halley that they would have video demo of their own modules being lifted like that.

    Jay Leno demonstrates portable hydraulic lifts.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz5Y34fUjlA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's a clip showing how they raise the unit and pack snow under those ski-legs
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEYi2l-zRpI



      Delete
    2. That's a great video, Rick. At 0.11 I can see the rock and roll action as the legs are raised one at a time. Where are the other modules though? I'd have though it was difficult to get all modules to sit in a plane.
      A guy has a 2007 construction blog, describing those "dagger boards" "bashed into the snow"
      The units wont slide away as it's totally flat here, but the flexing of the legs in high wind could cause them to "walk" if unsupported. This problem is solved by large dighy-style dagger boards bashed into the snow!
      http://antarctic-diary.blogspot.co.uk/2008/01/tents-are-on.html
      Yet there's 1.5m of snow per year.
      There was nothing on the blog concerning the arrival of this massive structure, it just seems to go up...admittedly this must have been the first module to appear, and the construction continued over several more seasons, allegedly.
      http://antarctic-diary.blogspot.co.uk/2008/01/halley-vi-coming-on-nicely.html

      It doesn't look very flat in this 2013 BBC video, with participation by the specialist polar architect, Hugh Broughton
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-21344320
      https://www.linkedin.com/in/hugh-broughton-06bb7b26
      http://www.hbarchitects.co.uk/news/successful-relocation-halley-vi/

      Wherever David went, there's nothing of interest on his video channel concerning Halley VI
      https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0wUqtINOc9Y3E9qJPtJLKA

      https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-evans-53b40026

      Delete
  4. Felix, I added a section to the post on HalleyVI... which includes a MAP of the cracks and the station location from Hugh Broughton. Just scroll up a bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just had a good laugh at that, Rick! What a carry-on. Good job it doesn't ever go wrong like that at the International Space Station, leaving the occupants terminally marooned.

      Delete
  5. Yeah, no kidding. I think it's about time they write a script for an ISS catastrophe-- similar to Apollo 13. The 3D movie I went to see with George Clooney was a good simulation of a possible space station disaster. Have you seen that? GRAVITY? https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_(film)&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiDzt7u37HSAhUKrFQKHUrxC8MQFggUMAA&sig2=bHl29dIVDNGsSg00GbUB9w&usg=AFQjCNEuix99tzKqyT_DQoDdM-JVCnYzAQ

    https://www.google.com/search?q=clooney+space+station&newwindow=1&safe=off&hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbm=vid&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiKhIb437HSAhVCyVQKHQw7DzgQ_AUIBg

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't give up your day job if you have one... Cause your reporting sucks.. You should try reporting for the daily mail

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Neil, I just found your comment now. Thanks for your post and your attendance-- though your response is a bit rough. Would you care to say a little more about the procedure for raising the hydraulic legs? Have you actually shovelled snow under a raised support? We here in the northern hemisphere in day jobs-- which I have not given up-- can't quite grasp the reality of what's going on at Halley. I get a lot of attendance at this blog, sometimes thousands of hits per post-- so please consider that and if you can, help us wrap our minds around your experience at Halley VI. I'm currently studying your own blog here... https://rickpotvinflatearth.blogspot.com/2017/07/neil-brough-who-worked-at-halley-vi.html

    Specifically to begin, did you work on the hydaulic leg support lifting and filling in? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. really so nice post. https://www.natashaescortservices.com/
    kolkata escorts

    ReplyDelete

Hi, I'm Captain Rick of the Virtual Circumference Voyage of Antarctica. I intend to prove definitively if Earth is flat or a sphere by paying careful attention to how many miles we cover as we travel "around" Antarctica. Flat earth theory says it's 50-60,000 miles. Spherical Earth theory says it 14,000 miles. Join me and ask any questions that you think would help our mission.