The following is so bizarre that I had a very hard time getting familiar with it but it raises some good points.
EARTH IS NOT ONLY FLAT-- IT'S A CRATER IN GREATER EARTH.
This new kid on the block as of August 2020 and now into Sept. 2020-- with a significant new rabbit hole to explore-- is "GodGevLamSte". He's pulling together a lot of various features of what flat-earthers have been talking about. In the past, I've tried to confine my own work to confirmation of a flat or spherical Earth based on the circumference around 60S vs. 60N. "GGLS" 's approach however is too interesting for me to ignore. He's basically saying that the Moon is a reflection of a LARGER or GREATER Earth-Plane in which our own EARTH is seen as a CRATER reflected on the moon. The GREATER Earth-plane is clearly seen in the Moon-mirror... and Earth is clearly seen as Sulpicius-Gallum-M, a crater. The entrance to the GREATER-EARTH-PLANE occurs south of South America into Antarctica and might look something like this...
https://www.livescience.com/59720-curious-stories-about-eclipses.html
NASA'S MISSIONS HAVE FLOWN OVER GREATER EARTH
NASA is not flying "into space" but rather over the Greater Earth Plane. Their photos of "the moon" are, in fact, photos of the surface of the "land beyond the South Pole" described by Admiral Byrd in the 1950's. In the following photo, you can clearly see the Earth Crater in the Plane of Greater Earth.
http://fisherka.csolutionshosting.net/astronote/plan/dhccat/img/Sulpicius%20GallusDMR.jpg
MOON MAP ON WIKIPEDIA IS GREATER EARTH MAP
I lost interest in moon maps a long time ago because, after all, there's only so much to be seen on a "lifeless planet". However, given GGLS's new perspective, the moon-map becomes the Greater-Earth-Plane-Map. In the following Wiki Moon map, you can see our Earth-Crater, Selpicius-Galum on the right and little lower than the middle.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/PytheasCraterLOC.jpg/900px-PytheasCraterLOC.jpg
Here's another map of Selcicius Gallus / Our Earth
http://www.refractorland.org/HMA/Images/23.gif
Tuesday, September 1, 2020
Crater Earth Map changes everything.
The above is a closeup of CRATER EARTH-- with the true shape of NORTH AMERICA... and surrounding ice wall. ASIA CHINA RUSSIA INDIA are above this depiction of NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA... Admittedly there are weird shapes here... like on the right, you have a very weird rendition of Antarctica... On a typical flat earth model, Antarctica surrounds the other continents... but here, we see Antarctica on the right... so what's on the other side? I have not drilled down on this model far enough to answer this but it's a model with lots of legs. Soon I'll put posts to the creator of the model on this blog. Then I'll set up a NEW EXPEDITION ... base on this model. Thanks for the comments below.
19 comments:
Hi, I'm Captain Rick of the Virtual Circumference Voyage of Antarctica. I intend to prove definitively if Earth is flat or a sphere by paying careful attention to how many miles we cover as we travel "around" Antarctica. Flat earth theory says it's 50-60,000 miles. Spherical Earth theory says it 14,000 miles. Join me and ask any questions that you think would help our mission.
Someone essentially help to make severely posts I might state. That is the very first time I frequented your web page and up to now? I amazed with the research you made to create this actual publish incredible. Magnificent job!
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end? I'll check back later and see if the problem still exists.
ReplyDeleteFascinating video....Crater Earth Map changes everything.
ReplyDeleteI have reposted to the LINK below.......
Simon Parkes: They're Hidden in Plain Sight - The Extraterrestrial Presence and Their Agenda
Saturday, January 16, 2021
https://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2021/01/simon-parkes-theyre-hidden-in-plain-sight-the-extraterrestrial-presence-and-their-agenda-2551993.html
but what of the ~40mile radius of shadow from a solar eclipse? not buying nasa umbra technobabble as i was in path of supposed umbra and it was just as bright as any other day and an umbra doesn't have such an acute gradient, it appears the moon is much closer/smaller then is stated, as looking at detail with optics which would be impossible at 250k miles away; cannot look across the country at landmarks with same optics.
ReplyDeletea small moon flies in the face of this particular video however.
I have not considered the eclipse... And I agree with you on the nonsensical acute gradient of the umbra... Whatever the moon is, I think it's smaller too... considering the optics...
DeleteAs far as this video... the small moon may not conflict with this video because we might be looking at a projection only... a projected map on a layer of atmosphere... a map of Greater Earth.
The reflection of Greater Earth in the moon doesn't have to be a REAL reflection. It could be spotlight only. I think I see your point in that IF it were a reflection of Greater Earth, it would have to be bigger to cover Greater Earth. But we're not seeing a reflection. We're seeing a projected image of the Greater Earth.
I realized that this sound absurd... but that's what I've got for you today haha. I'm as miffed as you are. Or anyone.
You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The world hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to say how they believe. Always go after your heart.
ReplyDeleteWow! This can be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I’m also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your effort.
Many thanks for creating the effort to talk about this, I feel strongly about this and love learning a great deal more on this subject.
Read More: German shepherd husky mix
I had the thought today that the only plausible way to show definitively whether the earth is round or flat would be to circumnavigate 60S. Went looking to see if anyone else had thought of the idea and stumbled upon this blog. It is certainly plausible that the reported circumnavigations you've mentioned in your posts are fraudulent, especially when you consider how Captian Cook (or whoever) clocked around 50k miles attempting Antarctic circumnavigation centuries ago.
ReplyDeleteThe question really boils down to this: who is going to do this and how? How could such a voyage be done independently and reliably? In my speculation I would say you need to have a jet, as doing it on water presents too many potential pitfalls. It would have to be meticulously documented and verifiable, so as to essentially be beyond debate. Who has the money or the resources to do such a thing? Certainly not me.
Whether it were done by boat or by plane, it just seems unlikely that such a voyage will actually occur, especially if there are powers that be who have a real interest in suppressing FE in the event it is true.
With no way to know for sure whether the reported circumnavs are legitimate, and with no way to investigate the question independently for lack of funding/capability, it seems that, at least for me, this will forever remain a "what if."
All of the extant arguments can be plausibly denied by globers because of the relativity of paradigms to observable phenomena (or whatever), but demonstrating a large discrepancy between 60S and globe circumference would be irrefutable if done correctly.
At the end of the day it's just extremely frustrating, since the likelihood of this actually be done is so slim.
If I had the money to blow...
The trip would have to be repeatable like any scientifically proven phenomemon. I thought about a repeatable cruise ship trip... and reviewed some round-the-world-trips by Pan Am Airways from the 1960's with a thought to creating a round-the-world-at-60S airline cruise. Documentation and proof on water would have to include star charts. Given the past 2 years of the covid hoax, the cruise ships shut down and airlines are now in trouble too.
DeleteThanks for the reply. I doubt any airlines or cruise lines would be willing to entertain it... at least, not if they knew it was for the purpose of proving whether it's FE or GE. Think about it: if "they" knew we were doing that, they would never let the trip happen through commercial airlines/cruise lines, since if we completed the trip successfully, it would prove the earth is flat (which they can't have, assuming this is in fact the reality of things).
DeletePeople with real money like Elon Musk might be willing to sponsor such a voyage but I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw it.
Maybe if we found a millionaire or two who are the same kind of crazy as us, with the time and ability to sponsor the voyage. On their own yacht, or in their own private jet. That's the only way I could see it happening. Then again, anything is possible in theory.
Thanks again and heres to hoping one day it happens, and in that day, I do believe we'll be vindicated.
Cruise ships only go to Anarctica in one very narrow area just south of South America but nowhere else. There are no Antarctic ship cruises going south from Australia/New Zealand for example. There have been airline cruises south of Australia and one cruise plane actually crashed landed and had to be rescued. None of the airline cruises land on Antarctica's many apparent ice-runways servicing the Antarctic stations. I tried contacting research station personnel several times, following their blogs, but reponses never amounted to much. I concluded that I would have to get a job at an Antarctica research station and began researching that. I've worked on service ships and have visited mining-drilling stations on the Arctic sea so I have a little experience in that way.
DeletePeople with money that I know generally are only interested in wealth preservation. Once they acquire the habit of making money, they never stop and stake stock. They seem to lose their mental capacity for reflecting and reviewing and planning new things. Many American high-net-worth people are putting their money into "Perpetual Trusts" which creates "dead hand estates", controlled by the wills of dead men. It's apparently a very big problem. Perp Trusts were outlawed for a long time because of this-- but then in the 1980's those laws were struck now. North Dakota is a state that invites Perpetual Trusts.
My best lead right now is "godgevlamste" on youtube. He's proposing we're in a half-crater-- the other half being ice... and the crate itself one of many craters on a "Bigger Earth". The moon is not a "ball in space" but rather a projection that is a back-lit "map" of the Bigger Earth. We can see where we are on it by locating the crater "Selpicius Gallus". The billionnaires are planning to move out of our Earth-1/2-crater into a set of mini-craters just outside our ice-wall and turn Earth itself into a nature preserve by genociding most of humanity.
What if part of the covid hoax WAS to scuttle the cruises and planes realizing that FE supporters were getting closer to the truth and that the 60s would soon become the most glaring way to prove FE
DeleteThat's worth a consideration and a chuckle. Thanks for that!
DeleteFollow-up question, Rick.
ReplyDeleteAre you trying to actually do this? I mean can you or will you really attempt this voyage? Because that would be awesome and honestly I want a FE person to do this and put the whole thing to rest. I wanna be able to know!
It depends on what you mean by try. I've been watching "divergent" on youtube and he's convinced the entire Antarctic shore is guarded with a small sliver of shoreline for tourists south of S. America. So that's out. Flying or sailing around 60S is likely going to be noticable. The model of the crater-Earth by godgevlamste on youtube-- which I favor right now-- is not exactly amenable to a 60S latitude trip. Half the crater Earth is squished into a non-circular oval, and the other half is occupied by what is currently Antarctica. The "ice wall surrounds the other half. The model is a mess, frankly. I'll try to draw my current image of it and account for the apparent stations. There is particular V-shaped area of Crater Earth that leads into Bigger Earth-- and water connects them. There is a Disney movie that portrays this. The current model is such a problem that I have to reconsider my theory that going around what is called 60S can prove anything one way or another.
DeleteThe idea of virtual circumnavigation was aimed at doing it from my living room, online. As I got going on the project, I did think about actually going... if possible. With the covid shutdown, it's unlikely now and I'll go back and do virtual. There's a real bouy project that planted electronic bouys all over the oceans-- I last worked on linking those together in a line around 60S but have not looked at my own work for a few years.
ReplyDeleteFinally, the shape of the earth might not be circular after all but something a bit more odd.... which is hard to conceive but for the past year, I had to consider the work of godgevlamste on Youtube. His point of view changes everything about this entire project and may be the very reason why we find it impossible to test flat earth theory-- Essentially, we're living in half-a-crater if you can imagine that!
Hey, it's me, the anon from the previous comment. Here's your experiment!
ReplyDeleteCharter a plane to fly from the coast of Brazil to the middle of Kenya. Two points, both on the Equator. If the earth is a globe, being that the points are a quarter way around the earth, that is, at a 90° central angle apart, the shortest distance between those two points will be along the Equator. IF, however, the earth is actually a flat plane, then the shortest distance will be a straight line, not along the Equator, but between the two points, cutting "under" the arc that is the Equator. If the earth is indeed flat, the straight-line distance is shorter than the route along the Equator by precisely the ratio of the arc to the chord, given a 90° central angle. To be specific, if the straight line is ~5600 miles, and the route along the Equator is 1/4 the circumference of the Equator, which is 6225 miles, then the Earth is flat. But if the earth is a globe, the 6225 mile figure remains the shortest distance. This is because the shortest distance between any two points on a flat surface is a straight line, but on a spherical surface it is a Great Circle (google it), and the only Great Circle that runs East to West is the Equator (which is actually, itself, an indicator that the Earth is flat).
That's a good test to run. I'll see what I can do with it in coming days/weeks and report back here. Theoretically the idea is sound but it's the practical issues that always bog us down. The configuration of Earth got complicated with godgevlamste's half-crater flood-zone...and I'm still testing that one. Have you taken a look at his theory? If not, please do. He has far more followers than me and is worth looking at. Let me know. I want everyone viewing this blog to consider his work.
DeleteI just think the crater earth idea is highly speculative. The notion that the moon is a reflection of a broader flat earth, and we are one of the craters, is intriguing but fantastical. I will admit I don't think it's likely, but I suppose it is possible. In my opinion, the first step is to perform the above mentioned experiment. Whatever the proper model of FE might be, the first step has to be disproving the globe. If the results of the above experiment confirm that the straight-line path is shorter than the Equator path, then the flood gates will open. Then again, who would trust it? Has to be indubitable.
DeleteI think if you do that experiment the world will know the truth. Numbers don't lie.
ReplyDelete