My haphazard research on the perimeter mileage around antarctica often digresses on other seemingly unrelated points but points which are poingant.... poingnant points. My haphazard obervations and comments are as follows... to be pulled together in a more coherent presentation later. Never sacrifice immediate reactions, however, to later coherence-- just publish as a way to stumble foward, I say.
Here's a diagram I found that clearly illustrates the 60 S, 70 and 80 Latitude sought along with unlabelled longitude lines. I'll use this later.
 |
I've been wondering by WHICH STATION the various science missions approach what they say is the south pole. I see indications that they ALL go through McMurdo. Since the south pole on a flat earth is actually just another perimeter, it makes sense that the authorities in charge only allow "one" entrance. I haven't confirmed this-- I've only seen indications of a potential of this being true. It needs to be checked.
It's important to get clear in our minds that 60 S is important. Look at the diagram. It's a perfect circle around the perfect little island of Antarctica. And they say it's 11,000 miles. The stupid Vendee sailboat race-- which can't possibly be real-- is said to sail around Antarctica at around 55 degrees Latitude so-- it's even further than 11,000 miles. For one thing-- even IF it were possible to sail that far with limited supplies, how stupid is it to attempt? Very, I say. And we're expected to believe it. Yeah, like 9/11 video fakery and moon landing fakery. Remember the old saw-- "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof"? Where is the extraordinary proof for Vendee Global being real?
Here's a nice clean map of "-60" and "-75". Try to study this map as I do and memorize where these lines of latitude are. Note the "0 longitude" and "180 longitude" at a right angle. Memorize those positions, as I'll try too.
Not related to the distance around the Antarctic-- which is my concern in this blog-- are the weird flight path systems displayed on internet based maps. No flight paths in the southern hemisphere is consistent with a flat earth. This type of map is stunning in its implications.
Math Boylen promotes flat earth but says the way to prove it is to take a rope and spikes and start moving across the south pole. That's a death trap, if the earth if flat because you'll end up with a non sustainable supply line. His suggestion will get you killed. My counter proposal is to fly around Antarctica's perimeter and prove it's 60,000 miles not 7000 miles. I posted to one of his youtubes but he never responded to me. Eric Dubay banned me from his flat earth forum when I asked about my approach to the proof. So far, Math and Eric, as much as I like their other material on flat earth-- are not my friends on this issue... which makes them possible shills I guess. Just guessing at this point. My approach is superior to both of their approaches in my opinion.
Here's an impressive picture of an airplane's compass. It shows a pilot a flat earth. If the earth were a globe, why would they be using this? It seems like a ridiculous way to approach the question but on a certain level, it makes sense.
If we approximate the Antarctica Island with a circle and divide into slices, then flip the slices backwards on themselves, we get an approximation of what the Antarctic Ice Wall / Plain might begin to look like. Notice that between the backward slices, I've put question marks. These would be large areas suddenly created -- that are not documented on the island.
